lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Resource limits interface proposal [was: pull request for writable limits]


On Thu, 6 May 2010, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I'm not entirely sure we need to care specially about INFINITY,
> > _especially_ since INF is really rather big in 64 bits. So to some degree,
> > making things 64-bit is _less_ likely to make INFINITIES a problem.
>
> I'm _sure_, someone will mention bloat and performance degradation
> on 32-bit, so there will be config option for 32-bit in-kernel limits.
> And if there will be config option, infinities are better be separated.

Umm. Why?

Adding an INF field will make it essentially impossible to use that thing
as a compatibility function, and/or together with the legacy rlimit()
system call. And that is going to be 99.999% of all uses.

I don't think you understand how system calls work. People don't use
Linux-only features. It's been shown over and over and over again. People
use the standard interfaces, and they don't _have_ that INF field. We can
extend ranges by just updating structures (see "stat()" and friends) and a
recompile will make it use higher limits, but we can't make programs use
new features.

So there is _no_ upside. There would be _no_ programs ever using it.

Whether the internal limits for the kernel are 32-bit or not makes
absolutely zero difference. And my argument is that _if_ they are 64-bit,
that makes the INF field even _less_ interesting. So they go from "zero
practical difference" in 32-bit to "f*ck it, nobody can _possibly_ care
even in theory" in 64-bit.

If the internal limits are 32-bit, then you just turn any 64-bit value
larger than the (32-bit) RLIM_INFINITY into a RLIM_INFINITY. And that's as
good as you can get with mixing with the legacy interface anyway.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-06 17:41    [W:0.117 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site