[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -tip] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption
    On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:45:24AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > > > We want the one with the least runtime overhead. These are instrumentation
    > > > routines, so we want to optimize them as much as possible.
    > Yeah, my point was either disable preemption or keep the checks. In
    > other words, if you don't disable preemption, do not use
    > raw_smp_procesor_id(), because then we will not catch it if it changes
    > in the future.
    > > ok, Ingo, dont apply this patch then for a while.
    > Send another patch, I'll test it again ;-)
    > -- Steve

    Ingo, Steven, it seems we have potential preemtion available
    in perf_event.c:validate_group:x86_pmu.schedule_events() which
    is reached via syscall from userspace perf_event_open() call,
    so get_cpu is still needed. But I'm a bit messed with call
    graph at the moment :(

    -- Cyrill

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-06 16:51    [W:0.022 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site