Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCHSET] sched,perf: unify tracers in sched and move perf on top of TP | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 05 May 2010 11:51:13 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 11:32 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Well, I already utterly hate that x86 can't build with ! > > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS, also requiring CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS is going the wrong > > way. > > > > I've always explicitly avoided depending on tracepoints, and I'd very > > much like to keep it that way. > > I was wondering the other way around - ie. the possibility to make > perf optional and maybe even as a module which depends on TPs, which > would be nicer than the current situation and make the code less > cluttered too.
I really really hate making perf rely on tracepoints.
| |