Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Take all anon_vma locks in anon_vma_lock
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > This does leave me worrying about concurrent faults poking at > vma->vm_end without synchronization.
I didn't check this patch in detail yet. I agree it can be removed and I think it can be safely replaced with the page_table_lock.