lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Sat, 29 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

    > Correct, I strongly oppose using suspend. Not running runnable tasks is
    > not a sane solution.
    >
    > If current hardware can't cope, too friggin bad, get better hardware.

    Taken out of context, this statement suggests you believe that
    x86-based laptops should not be allowed to suspend automatically when
    their lids are closed, and that everybody should replace their
    x86-based laptops with something better.

    Is that really what you mean?

    Alan Stern



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-29 16:19    [W:4.063 / U:0.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site