Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 May 2010 09:00:05 +1000 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) |
| |
Hi.
I like the sound of this much better too, but...
On 30/05/10 08:13, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Alan Stern<stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: >> There is no /sys/power/policy file. In place of opportunistic suspend, >> we have "QoS-based suspend". This is initiated by userspace writing >> "qos" to /sys/power/state, and it is very much like suspend-to-RAM. > > Why do you want to tie it to a specific state?
I do agree here. I would suggest that all /sys/power/state possibilities should have a qos- equivalent. You might not want to use any or all of them, but they should be available.
Regards,
Nigel
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |