lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:27 -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
    > From my reading of this thread, there's a lot of overlap between
    > suspendblockers and constraints. Many use cases are served equally
    > well with one or the other,

    If using suspend-blockers,

    Please explain to me how:

    - I will avoid the cpu going into some idle state for which the wakeup
    latency is larger than my RT app fancies?

    - to avoid some tasks from being serviced by the filesystems whilst
    others are? (ionice on steroids).

    - does my sporadic task (with strict bandwidth budget) not suffer
    bandwidth inversion?


    suspend blockers do a bit of each of that, but none of it in a usable
    fashion.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-28 20:19    [W:0.021 / U:61.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site