[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:27 -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> From my reading of this thread, there's a lot of overlap between
> suspendblockers and constraints. Many use cases are served equally
> well with one or the other,

If using suspend-blockers,

Please explain to me how:

- I will avoid the cpu going into some idle state for which the wakeup
latency is larger than my RT app fancies?

- to avoid some tasks from being serviced by the filesystems whilst
others are? (ionice on steroids).

- does my sporadic task (with strict bandwidth budget) not suffer
bandwidth inversion?

suspend blockers do a bit of each of that, but none of it in a usable

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-28 20:19    [W:0.509 / U:2.272 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site