Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/17] fs/xfs/quota: Add missing mutex_unlock | From | Alex Elder <> | Date | Fri, 28 May 2010 12:57:32 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> > > Add a mutex_unlock missing on the error path. The use of this lock is > balanced elsewhere in the file.
Looks good. I'll pull this one into the XFS tree.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @@ > expression E1; > @@ > > * mutex_lock(E1,...); > <+... when != E1 > if (...) { > ... when != E1 > * return ...; > } > ...+> > * mutex_unlock(E1,...); > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> > > --- > The use of ENOMEM rather than -ENOMEM is also a bit odd. > > fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > index 38e7641..2d8b7bc 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > @@ -249,8 +249,10 @@ xfs_qm_hold_quotafs_ref( > > if (!xfs_Gqm) { > xfs_Gqm = xfs_Gqm_init(); > - if (!xfs_Gqm) > + if (!xfs_Gqm) { > + mutex_unlock(&xfs_Gqm_lock); > return ENOMEM; > + } > } > > /*
| |