lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf: make perf report -D print sampled CPU
Em Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:08:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> It is useful to know on which CPU a sample was captured on.
> The information is captured with perf record -R but it was
> not printed out by perf report -D. This patch adds this.
>
> When -R is not used, cpu is set to -1to indicate that
> the CPU is unknown (it is not captured).
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>

It conflicts with Arun's patch for sorting by CPU that I started playing with
yesterday, but in a good way, i.e. printing the CPU at that dump_printf spot
was one of the changs I made in Arun's patch as well.

[root@emilia linux-2.6-tip]# perf report -D | grep SAMPLE | head -6
0x10240 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 2 17252/17252: 0xffffffff81253362 period: 1894446
0x10268 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 2 17252/17252: 0xffffffff81253338 period: 1894446
0x10290 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 2 17252/17252: 0xffffffff8125300d period: 1905103
0x102b8 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 0 0/0: 0xffffffff8109117d period: 1838260
0x102e0 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 0 293/293: 0xffffffff8101ace6 period: 352697
0x10308 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 0 1763/1763: 0xffffffff8101ace6 period: 352697
[root@emilia linux-2.6-tip]#

I added it just before the pid/tid but prefixing it with "cpu: " is as good as
doing it that way.

I'm applying both patches after some tests,

Thanks!

- Arnaldo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-28 15:01    [W:0.062 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site