lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 28 May 2010 10:53:33 +0100
FromAlan Cox <>
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Ted

As a PS to the previous email the situation has I think more choices than
you portray.

Given the need for various constraints imposed by drivers for things like
RT it's entirely possible that a solution ends up being something like


Kernel proper:
Turn suspend block kernel API into an expression of constraints (or
whatever else seems to work)
Throw the user space in the bin

Google:
Use the constraints in a sledgehammer manner (hey it solves your problem
in that form so why not)
Patch in a private user space API


That makes things much much easier as we don't risk getting a horribly
broken API into the kernel that is hard to remove, while hopefully
meaning its rather easier for google to merge drivers and other code as
well as to maintain a smaller patch set.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-28 11:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2010