Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 May 2010 22:38:19 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) |
| |
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:33:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > The two of you are talking at cross purposes. Thomas is referring to > > idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend. > > Yes, and forced suspend to disk is the same as force suspend to disk, > which has both nothing to do with sensible resource management.
It doesn't matter. Current forced suspend to RAM is racy with respect to wakeup events and should be fixed.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |