[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    > > So PCs with current ACPI don't get opportunistic suspend capability. It
    > > probably won't be supported on the Commodore Amiga either - your point ?
    > Actually, the reverse - there's no terribly good way to make PCs work
    > with scheduler-based suspend, but there's no reason why they wouldn't
    > work with the current opportunistic suspend implementation.

    If one works so does the other.

    > In some cases, not all. It may be a latency constraint (in which case
    > pm_qos is an appropriate mechanism), but instead it may be something
    > like "A key was pressed but never read" or "A network packet was
    > received but not delivered". These don't fit into the pm_qos model, but
    > it's state that you have to track.

    I never mentioned pm_qos, just latency *and* knowing what suspend states
    are acceptable. You need both.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-27 20:13    [W:0.018 / U:112.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site