Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Thu, 27 May 2010 19:56:21 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:52 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> If that's what you're aiming for then you don't need to block > applications on hardware access because they should all already have > idled themselves.
Correct, a well behaved app would have. I thought we all agreed that well behaved apps weren't the problem?
> > Note that it doesn't need to broadcast this, it could opt to reply with > > that message on the first drawing attempt after it goes away and block > > on the second. > > That's more interesting, but you're changing semantics quite heavily at > this point.
So?
| |