[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and
> > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no
> mem should be replaced by an idle suspend to ram mechanism

In other words, you are suggesting that not only should the Android
patches not be accepted, in addition a large part of the PM suspend
framework should be rewritten?

Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 19:43    [W:0.293 / U:5.120 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site