[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Thu, 27 May 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

    > > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and
    > > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no
    > mem should be replaced by an idle suspend to ram mechanism

    In other words, you are suggesting that not only should the Android
    patches not be accepted, in addition a large part of the PM suspend
    framework should be rewritten?

    Alan Stern

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-27 19:43    [W:0.036 / U:0.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site