[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:06:23PM +0200, ext Alan Stern wrote:
    >If people don't mind, here is a greatly simplified summary of the
    >comments and objections I have seen so far on this thread:
    > The in-kernel suspend blocker implementation is okay, even
    > beneficial.

    I disagree here. I believe expressing that as QoS is much better. Let
    the kernel decide which power state is better as long as I can say I
    need 100us IRQ latency or 100ms wakeup latency.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-27 18:31    [W:0.025 / U:4.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site