lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromNicolas Palix <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
DateThu, 27 May 2010 13:42:25 +0200
On Thursday 27 May 2010 13:17:58 Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > >
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression E1;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > * spin_lock(E1,...);
> > > <+... when != E1
> > > if (...) {
> > > ... when != E1
> > > * return ...;
> > > }
> > > ...+>
> > > * spin_unlock(E1,...);
> > > // </smpl>
> >
> > Btw, I think it would be great to have a collection of these semantic
> > match scripts in the kernel repository together with a build target to
> > run these scripts over the kernel sources (like the cscope target).
> > Opinions?
>
> We have submitted and received some feedback on an initial version of
> this, but I'm not completely sure of the current status.

You can see the latest feedback we get at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/10/257

The initial submission and its comments are at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/269

>
> julia
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-27 13:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2010