[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support.
    On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:18 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
    > > Or make the suspend manager a C proglet and provide a JNI interface,
    > > or whatever.
    > It's a fairly large piece of code to try to rewrite in C, so I don't
    > think that's feasible on a reasonable timescale. Android does have the
    > concept of special sockets that can be used to communicate from less to
    > more privileged processes (it has a very segmented runtime model), so
    > these might be usable ... they have a drawback that they're essentially
    > named pipes, so no multiplexing, but one per suspend influencing C
    > process shouldn't be a huge burden.

    It wouldn't need to convert the whole Frameworks layer into C, just
    enough to manage the suspend state.

    Anyway, I think there's been enough arguments against even the concept
    of opportunistic/auto-suspend, and I for one will object with a NAK if
    Rafael send this to Linus.

    The whole idea of segregating userspace like that, and not letting
    runnable thing run is very ill considered indeed.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-26 18:31    [W:0.024 / U:11.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site