lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
From
Date
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > Implementation-wise it probably ties into setpidle, its simply that a task
> > has a pair of idle values, a dynamic one and a base one, the dynamic one
> > being the base one but updatable temporarily by drivers.

> How does this address the loss of wakeup events while using suspend?
> (For example the 2 issues formulated by Alan Stern in [1])

By not suspending obviously.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-26 17:15    [W:0.573 / U:2.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site