lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    From
    2010/5/26 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>:
    > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 03:25 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
    >
    >> and on systems where the
    >> same power state can be used from idle and suspend, we use suspend so
    >> we can stay in the low power state for minutes to hours instead of
    >> milliseconds to seconds.
    >
    > So don't you think working on making it possible for systems to be idle
    > _that_ long would improve things for everybody? as opposed to this
    > auto-suspend which only improves matters for those that (can) use it?

    I'm not preventing anyone from working on improving this. Currently
    both the kernel and our user-space code polls way too much. I don't
    think it is reasonable to demand that no one should run any user-space
    code with periodic timers when we have not even fixed the kernel to
    not do this.

    --
    Arve Hjønnevåg
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-26 12:43    [W:0.116 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site