[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)

    > > There are several general problems with the design of opportunistic
    > > suspend and suspend-blocks.
    > >
    > > 1. The opportunistic suspend code bypasses existing Linux kernel code,
    > > such as timers and the scheduler, that indicates when code
    > > needs to run, and when the system is idle.
    > Whoa! That's not my understanding at all.
    > As I see it, opportunistic suspend doesn't bypass any code that isn't
    > already bypassed by the existing suspend code. Users can do
    > echo mem >/sys/power/state
    > whenever they want, without regard to kernel timers and the scheduler
    > (other than the fact that the user's thread must be running in order to
    > carry out the write, of course).

    Yep. And while I'm co-responsible for that interface, I would not
    call it exactly nice. Yes, it does the job.

    But imagine horrors atd/cron would have to do to work properly with
    that interface... setting rtc wakeups etc.

    So yes, mem > state already breaks promises, but lets not extend that.

    (cesky, pictures)

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-25 09:55    [W:0.019 / U:29.748 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site