[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 3/7] softirq: avoid softirq_work_list for SCHED_SOFTIRQ when sent remotely
    On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:27 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    > plain text document attachment
    > (fix_local_trigger_remote_softirq_for_sched.patch)
    > There is no need to add the SCHED_SOFTIRQ work to the softirq_work_list
    > when sent remotely. This is because any pending work associated with
    > SCHED_SOFTIRQ need not be migrated to a new cpu when the current cpu is
    > going down etc.
    > Also I am not sure how this softirq_work_list works for other softirqs.
    > I don't see anyone removing the list entries from the softirq_work_list
    > after it is handled on a remote cpu.

    Most odd all that, Dave, Jens, what happened to all that remote_softirq

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-20 10:15    [W:0.029 / U:1.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site