lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push model
Hey,

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:07:42PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> "Load balancing tick" is still number one in my powertop list of top
> causes of wakeups (sitting at ~60 to 80 per second as I type this, with
> ~170 wakeups per second total). Comparing this to the numbers I posted
> earlier, we seem to have a win.
>
> I do wonder, though, whether further work could still be done. If I take
> one core offline, for example, I'm still getting load balancing ticks.
> Intuitively, I'd expect there to be no need for them with only one core
> available. But maybe I'm just ignorant of what's going on.

Are you using HZ=1000, and is the CPU active ~ 6-8 % ? If so, is it just the
regular timer tick while the CPU is active, and so not a real "wakeup"? (Or
possibly double the number if both CPUs are active)

Best,
Dominik


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-20 13:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site