[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ramzswap: Remove backing swap support
    On 05/16/2010 09:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 09:13:46PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
    >> Hi Minchan,
    >> On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
    >>> One thing was about naming.
    >>> Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify
    >>> (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap.
    >>> So I thought we would be better to more abstract name.
    >>> I thought trim like naming as Linus said.
    >> This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim
    >> stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid
    >> confusing it with trim/discard etc.
    >>> Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged
    >>> linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a
    >>> interest in your good ramzswap. :)
    >> Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :)
    >> Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in
    >> linux-next?
    > It's already there, right?

    Yuk! its there.

    I actually wanted to refer to the 'swap notify patch'. Please see patch titled:
    'ramzswap: Eliminate stale data from compressed memory (v2)'

    This patch got 3 Acks: Pekka, Linus and Nigel.

    (Minchan, please always reply to the patch your are referring to)


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-16 18:57    [W:0.021 / U:12.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site