[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/12] KVM, x86, ppc, asm-generic: moving dirty bitmaps to user space
    Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
    > Hi, sorry for sending from my personal account.
    > The following series are all from me:
    > From: Takuya Yoshikawa <>
    > The 3rd version of "moving dirty bitmaps to user space".
    > From this version, we add x86 and ppc and asm-generic people to CC lists.
    > [To KVM people]
    > Sorry for being late to reply your comments.
    > Avi,
    > - I've wrote an answer to your question in patch 5/12: drivers/vhost/vhost.c .
    > - I've considered to change the set_bit_user_non_atomic to an inline function,
    > but did not change because the other helpers in the uaccess.h are written as
    > macros. Anyway, I hope that x86 people will give us appropriate suggestions
    > about this.
    > - I thought that documenting about making bitmaps 64-bit aligned will be
    > written when we add an API to register user-allocated bitmaps. So probably
    > in the next series.
    > Avi, Alex,
    > - Could you check the ia64 and ppc parts, please? I tried to keep the logical
    > changes as small as possible.
    > I personally tried to build these with cross compilers. For ia64, I could check
    > build success with my patch series. But book3s, even without my patch series,
    > it failed with the following errors:
    > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c: In function 'kvmppc_emulate_paired_single':
    > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c:1289: error: the frame size of 2288 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
    > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.o] Error 1
    > make: *** [arch/powerpc/kvm] Error 2

    This is bad. I haven't encountered that one at all so far, but I guess
    my compiler version is different from yours. Sigh.

    > About changelog: there are two main changes from the 2nd version:
    > 1. I changed the treatment of clean slots (see patch 1/12).
    > This was already applied today, thanks!
    > 2. I changed the switch API. (see patch 11/12).
    > To show this API's advantage, I also did a test (see the end of this mail).
    > [To x86 people]
    > Hi, Thomas, Ingo, Peter,
    > Please review the patches 4,5/12. Because this is the first experience for
    > me to send patches to x86, please tell me if this lacks anything.
    > [To ppc people]
    > Hi, Benjamin, Paul, Alex,
    > Please see the patches 6,7/12. I first say sorry for that I've not tested these
    > yet. In that sense, these may not be in the quality for precise reviews. But I
    > will be happy if you would give me any comments.
    > Alex, could you help me? Though I have a plan to get PPC box in the future,
    > currently I cannot test these.

    Could you please point me to a git tree where everything's readily
    applied? That would make testing a lot easier.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-12 10:15    [W:0.028 / U:73.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site