Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems | Date | Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:12:04 +0200 |
| |
Am Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 17:46:17 schrieb Alan Stern: > Or alternatively, instead of allocating regular memory the routine > could simply fail. Then the caller would be responsible for checking > and using regular memory instead of dma-consistent memory. Of course, > that would put an even larger burden on the caller than just forcing it > to keep track of what flag to use.
Then it would be sensible to pass it a filled URB, modify it or return an error code.
Regards Oliver
| |