Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:56:01 -0400 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/14] Add /sys trigger for per-node memory compaction |
| |
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:31:48 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> A cgroup which controls placement of memory is cpuset.
err, yes, that.
> One idea is per cpuset. But per-node seems ok.
Which is superior?
Which maps best onto the way systems are used (and onto ways in which we _intend_ that systems be used)?
Is the physical node really the best unit-of-administration? And is direct access to physical nodes the best means by which admins will manage things?
| |