lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] IPVS: replace sprintf to snprintf to avoid stack buffer overflow
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:58:28AM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, <wzt.wzt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > IPVS not check the length of pp->name, use sprintf will cause stack buffer overflow.
> > struct ip_vs_protocol{} declare name as char *, if register a protocol as:
> > struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_test = {
> >        .name =                 "aaaaaaaa....128...aaa",
> >        .debug_packet =         ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
> > };
> >
> > when called ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet(), sprintf(buf, "%s TRUNCATED", pp->name);
> > will cause stack buffer overflow.
> >
>
> Long messages will be truncated instead of buffer overflow. We need to
> find a way to handle long messages elegantly.

Its really a corner case. In practice protocol modules don't have really
long names. And if one was merged that did, the buffer size could be increased
at that time.

So while I think its reasonable to protect against something unexpected
in a protocol-module name crashing the system. Especially as that
can be achieved without any real overhead. I don't think we need
to sanitise the output.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-06 05:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site