Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 4 Apr 2010 21:22:22 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: A few questions and issues with dynticks, NOHZ and powertop |
| |
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 08:44:05PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >And you did mention offlining some CPUs above. The folloiwng patch > >(from Lai Jiangshan) is needed to handle this case. > > btw on x86... don't offline CPUs if you want to save power.. it doesn't. > (at least not during idle.. and when you're busy it might save power, > but it won't save you energy normally)
Hmmm... The fact that offlining CPUs doesn't save power could form the basis of an interesting rationalization for my having ignored offlined CPUs in my original patch, I suppose. ;-)
So the proper approach is to affinity everything away from the CPUs in question so that they stay in dyntick-idle mode? I must confess that I find this quite counter-intuitive -- and I suspect that I am not the only one who would expect offlined CPUs to drop to the lowest possible power consumption.
Thanx, Paul
| |