[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview
On 04/29/2010 09:59 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I'm convinced it's useful. The API is so close to a block device
> (read/write with key/value vs read/write with sector/value) that we
> should make the effort not to introduce a new API.

Plus of course the asynchronity and batching of the block layer. Even
if you don't use a dma engine, you improve performance by exiting one
per several dozen pages instead of for every page, perhaps enough to
allow the hypervisor to justify copying the memory with non-temporal moves.

I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-30 20:27    [W:0.078 / U:1.292 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site