[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/9] PM: suspend_block: Add debugfs file
    On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Randy Dunlap <> wrote:
    > On 04/25/10 11:15, Greg KH wrote:
    >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:58:53PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    >>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:08:54 -0700 Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote:
    >>>> Report active and inactive suspend blockers in
    >>>> /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_blockers.
    >>> This looks more like user interface information than it does debug information.
    >>> If that's correct, it shouldn't be in debugfs.
    >> It's debug-like information, and has more than one value per file, so
    >> debugfs seems like the proper place for it.  I have no objection to it
    >> going there.
    > I have no objection if it really is debug info, but I'm not convinced
    > of that yet.

    Our most common use of this information is to capture it in bugreports
    (along with process lists, system/radio logs, memory stats, etc) as
    one additional piece of data used to diagnose a misbehaving device
    (most commonly to answer the "why does the battery seem to be draining
    too quickly?" question).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-04-26 08:27    [W:0.021 / U:0.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site