[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL v2] Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal
On Saturday 24 April 2010 20:47:17 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I don't see the point, frankly. Especially not outside the merge window,
> > but quite frankly, I don't see it in general. The whole thing seems to be
> > designed to be inconvenient, and to have a config option that I
> > fundamentally don't believe in (CONFIG_BKL).
> More detail: it still leaves that old "ioctl" function pointer that needs
> the BKL and is ungreppable. So the whole and only point of the patch is to
> make our current mess even more complex, with three different cases. No,
> thank you.
> Quite frankly, if you want to get rid of the BKL in ioctl's and make them
> easily greppable, then I would suggest a simple renaming: rename the
> current '->ioctl()' thing to '->bkl_ioctl()', and mark it deprecated. No
> new config options, no new games. Just rename it. No need to mark things
> with CONFIG_BKL, when you can just see it by virtue of them using
> 'bkl_ioctl'.

We want to do the rename in the next merge window and remove the old
->ioctl(), this patch is just a preparation for this so we can start
queuing the patches for the rename in maintainer trees.
The addition of the deprecated_ioctl() helper is not essential but
let's us move all BKL users into loadable modules next.

The CONFIG_BKL stuff is not a requirement for doing this, but something
we /also/ want to do in the next merge window, i.e. mark all BKL users
as CONFIG_BKL, not just the ones that use the locked_ioctl (or bkl_ioctl).

I agree that it's now a bit late for this, but when I initially suggested
this (before -rc3, IIRC), that would have given us the chance to queue up
all the patches with a dependency on this for the next merge window.
Now the current outlook is probably that we do a lot of the preparation
work like this patch in 2.6.35-rc1, which moves the merge of the interesting
parts out to the 2.6.36 timeframe.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-24 21:57    [W:0.125 / U:6.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site