lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 24 Apr 2010 12:47:34 +0200
FromFlorian Tobias Schandinat <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/11] viafb: rework the I2C support in the VIA framebuffer driver
Florian Tobias Schandinat schrieb:
> Jonathan Corbet schrieb:
>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:40:39 +0200
>> Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Meanwhile, I'm a little unsure now...is there an action item for me
>> with regard to the i2c code? I've been staring at it since your last
>> note, but I couldn't find any obvious problems. I do have to say that
>> Harald's rework is far cleaner than what came before...
>
> Well the main question is probably:
> How does it change the behaviour towards the hardware?
> I tend to think that OLPC might not be the only ones who did something
> weird with it....and we already know that we shouldn't trust the
> documentation too much.

I was able to narrow this issue down to the fourth bus. So with
if (i == 4)
continue;
in the bus creation loop I'm able to get a working framebuffer which
does not have the issues mentioned. Any ideas what should be done now?

Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-24 12:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2010