Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:35:49 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/14] mm,migration: Allow the migration of PageSwapCache pages |
| |
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:39:48PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:23:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:31:35PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > Hi Mel, > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:44:43PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > heh, I thought of a similar approach at the same time as you but missed > > > > this mail until later. However, with this approach I suspect there is a > > > > possibility that two walkers of the same anon_vma list could livelock if > > > > two locks on the list are held at the same time. Am still thinking of > > > > how it could be resolved without introducing new locking. > > > > > > Trying to understand this issue and I've some questions. This > > > vma_adjust and lock inversion troubles with the anon-vma lock in > > > rmap_walk are a new issue introduced by the recent anon-vma changes, > > > right? > > > > > > > In a manner of speaking. There was no locking going on but prior to the > > anon_vma changes, there would have been only one anon_vma lock and the > > fix would be easier - just take the lock on anon_vma->lock while the > > VMAs are being updated. > > So it was very much a bug before too and we could miss to find some > pte mapping the page if vm_start was adjusted?
Well I looked deeper into it myself as I wanted to have this bit (and other bits) sorted out in aa.git, and definitely this is a bug introduced by the newest anon-vma changes in 2.6.34-rc so aa.git cannot be affected as it's using the 2.6.33 anon-vma (and prev) code.
vma_adjust already takes the anon_vma->lock and of course I also further verified that trying to apply your snippet to vma_adjust results in immediately deadlock as the very same lock is already taken in my tree as it's the same anon-vma (simpler). So aa.git will be immune from these bugs for now.
| |