lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[094/139] 9p: Skip check for mandatory locks when unlocking
2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>

commit f78233dd44a110c574fe760ad6f9c1e8741a0d00 upstream.

While investigating a bug, I came across a possible bug in v9fs. The
problem is similar to the one reported for NFS by ASANO Masahiro in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/21/334.

v9fs_file_lock() will skip locks on file which has mode set to 02666.
This is a problem in cases where the mode of the file is changed after
a process has obtained a lock on the file. Such a lock will be skipped
during unlock and the machine will end up with a BUG in
locks_remove_flock().

v9fs_file_lock() should skip the check for mandatory locks when
unlocking a file.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);

/* No mandatory locks */
- if (__mandatory_lock(inode))
+ if (__mandatory_lock(inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
return -ENOLCK;

if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-22 22:21    [W:0.364 / U:3.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site