Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:40:22 +1000 | From | Neil Brown <> | Subject | Re: patch md-raid5-allow-for-more-than-2-31-chunks.patch added to 2.6.33-stable tree |
| |
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:08:30 +0200 "Stefan Lippers-Hollmann" <s.L-H@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi > > On Thursday 22 April 2010, gregkh@suse.de wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled > > > > Subject: md/raid5: allow for more than 2^31 chunks. > > > > to the 2.6.33-stable tree. Its filename is > > > > md-raid5-allow-for-more-than-2-31-chunks.patch > > > > A git repo of this tree can be found at > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > From 35f2a591192d0a5d9f7fc696869c76f0b8e49c3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> > > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:13:34 +1000 > > Subject: md/raid5: allow for more than 2^31 chunks. > > > > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> > > > > commit 35f2a591192d0a5d9f7fc696869c76f0b8e49c3d upstream. > > > > With many large drives and small chunk sizes it is possible > > to create a RAID5 with more than 2^31 chunks. Make sure this > > works. > > > > Reported-by: Brett King <king.br@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > This patch, as part of the current 2.6.33 stable queue, breaks compiling > on i386 (CONFIG_LBDAF=y) for me (amd64 builds fine): > > [...] > BUILD arch/x86/boot/bzImage > Root device is (254, 6) > Setup is 12700 bytes (padded to 12800 bytes). > System is 2415 kB > CRC db6fa5fa > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#1) > ERROR: "__umoddi3" [drivers/md/raid456.ko] undefined! > > reverting just this patch fixes the problem for me.
Thanks for testing and reporting.
If you could verify that this additional patch fixes the compile error I would really appreciate it.
Thanks, NeilBrown
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 20e4840..58ea0ec 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, int previous, int *dd_idx, struct stripe_head *sh) { - sector_t stripe; + sector_t stripe, stripe2; sector_t chunk_number; unsigned int chunk_offset; int pd_idx, qd_idx; @@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, */ stripe = chunk_number; *dd_idx = sector_div(stripe, data_disks); - + stripe2 = stripe; /* * Select the parity disk based on the user selected algorithm. */ @@ -1689,21 +1689,21 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, case 5: switch (algorithm) { case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx) (*dd_idx)++; break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx) (*dd_idx)++; break; case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks; break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks; break; case ALGORITHM_PARITY_0: @@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, switch (algorithm) { case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks); + pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = pd_idx + 1; if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) { (*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */ @@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, (*dd_idx) += 2; /* D D P Q D */ break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = pd_idx + 1; if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) { (*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */ @@ -1741,12 +1741,12 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, (*dd_idx) += 2; /* D D P Q D */ break; case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks); + pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = (pd_idx + 1) % raid_disks; *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 2 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks; break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC: - pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = (pd_idx + 1) % raid_disks; *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 2 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks; break; @@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, /* Exactly the same as RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC, but or * of blocks for computing Q is different. */ - pd_idx = stripe % raid_disks; + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = pd_idx + 1; if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) { (*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */ @@ -1780,7 +1780,8 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, * D D D P Q rather than * Q D D D P */ - pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - ((stripe + 1) % raid_disks); + stripe2 += 1; + pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = pd_idx + 1; if (pd_idx == raid_disks-1) { (*dd_idx)++; /* Q D D D P */ @@ -1792,7 +1793,7 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, case ALGORITHM_ROTATING_N_CONTINUE: /* Same as left_symmetric but Q is before P */ - pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - (stripe % raid_disks); + pd_idx = raid_disks - 1 - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks); qd_idx = (pd_idx + raid_disks - 1) % raid_disks; *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % raid_disks; ddf_layout = 1; @@ -1800,27 +1801,27 @@ static sector_t raid5_compute_sector(raid5_conf_t *conf, sector_t r_sector, case ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC_6: /* RAID5 left_asymmetric, with Q on last device */ - pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % (raid_disks-1); + pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1); if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx) (*dd_idx)++; qd_idx = raid_disks - 1; break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_ASYMMETRIC_6: - pd_idx = stripe % (raid_disks-1); + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1); if (*dd_idx >= pd_idx) (*dd_idx)++; qd_idx = raid_disks - 1; break; case ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC_6: - pd_idx = data_disks - stripe % (raid_disks-1); + pd_idx = data_disks - sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1); *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % (raid_disks-1); qd_idx = raid_disks - 1; break; case ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC_6: - pd_idx = stripe % (raid_disks-1); + pd_idx = sector_div(stripe2, raid_disks-1); *dd_idx = (pd_idx + 1 + *dd_idx) % (raid_disks-1); qd_idx = raid_disks - 1; break;
| |