Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:37:59 -0500 | From | Mike Christie <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI for iBFT. |
| |
On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:21:28 +0000 > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org> wrote: > >> For machines with IBFT 1.03 do scan the ACPI table for 'iBFT' >> or for 'IBFT'. If the machine is in UEFI mode, only do the ACPI >> table scan. For all other machines (pre IBFT 1.03) do >> a memory scan if not found in the ACPI tables. >> >> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org> > > The Author: line is unneeded and inappropriate here. That's what the > From: line does. > >> Acked-by: Peter Jones<pjones@redhat.com> >> Tested-by: Mike Christie<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org> > > Your covering email indicates that Mike and Peter wrote the patches, > but neither of the patches have their signoffs. Can we please sort all > this out? >
I did a small fix to ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> if needed.
I did not do any changes to ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.
I tested both patches.
| |