lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI for iBFT.
On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:21:28 +0000
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> For machines with IBFT 1.03 do scan the ACPI table for 'iBFT'
>> or for 'IBFT'. If the machine is in UEFI mode, only do the ACPI
>> table scan. For all other machines (pre IBFT 1.03) do
>> a memory scan if not found in the ACPI tables.
>>
>> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org>
>
> The Author: line is unneeded and inappropriate here. That's what the
> From: line does.
>
>> Acked-by: Peter Jones<pjones@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Mike Christie<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org>
>
> Your covering email indicates that Mike and Peter wrote the patches,
> but neither of the patches have their signoffs. Can we please sort all
> this out?
>

I did a small fix to
ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to
compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie
<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by:
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> if needed.

I did not do any changes to
ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.

I tested both patches.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-21 23:41    [W:0.055 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site