Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:54:20 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock |
| |
On 04/20/2010 09:23 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 04/20/2010 02:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> btw, do you want this code in pvclock.c, or shall we keep it kvmclock >> specific? >> > I think its a pvclock-level fix. I'd been hoping to avoid having > something like this, but I think its ultimately necessary. >
Did you observe drift on Xen, or is this "ultimately" pointing at the future?
-- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
| |