[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] X86: Optimise fls(), ffs() and fls64()
On 04/15/2010 11:48 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Avi Kivity<> wrote:
>> Even if Intel processors behave that way, other processors (real and
>> emulated) use those manuals as a specification. Emulated processors are
>> unlikely to touch an undefined register, but real processors may.
>> (qemu tcg appears not to touch the output)
> Possibly because the AMD64 spec specifies that the destination will be
> unchanged if the source was 0.

Likely. But we haven't tested all current and future x86 clones, and
they may be based off the Intel documentation instead of the AMD

I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-15 10:53    [W:0.051 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site