[lkml]   [2010]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map
On 04/13/2010 03:29 PM, Yinghai wrote:
> On 04/13/2010 02:58 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 04/13/2010 02:42 PM, Yinghai wrote:
>>> On 04/13/2010 02:18 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> On 04/13/2010 02:11 PM, Yinghai wrote:
>>>>>> I guess the real question (which I haven't looked at myself) is if the
>>>>>> E820_RESERVED -> BUSY will cause an explicitly assigned BAR from being
>>>>>> moved. That's bad, not so much for this particular range, but from BARs
>>>>>> which may be assigned by SMM. Hacking that up in a simulator
>>>>>> (Qemu/Bochs) and testing it is probably on the to do list...
>>>>> no, if some device BAR fall in that range, it should still use that range, and will not be relocated.
>>>>> will update the change log.
>>>> Good, that's what we want.
>>> the driver for that device later can not use pci_request_region(). because that region is BUSY already.
>> That's not good (in general - for devices in this particular range it's
>> not such a big deal, but it is potentially really bad for devices marked
>> reserved for them not to be moved.)
>> We have talked about a need to resolve this before.
> current code for mmio that is just below 4g, if some PCI BAR use that range, and those range is falling into E820_RESERVED,
> those range still can be claimed, but driver can not use pci_request_region() later.
should be
but driver can use pci_request_region() later.

> So We still
> 1. rely that BIOS does not reserve the [0xa0000, 0xe0000)
> 2. kernel only reserve the range when we make sure these is legacy device on that range.
> YH

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-04-14 00:43    [W:0.447 / U:35.632 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site