Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:03:02 -0400 | From | Vivek Goyal <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] memcg: update documentation v5 |
| |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:57:18AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:45:53PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >
Typed wrong email id last time and mail bounced. So here is another attempt.
> [..] > > -2. Locking > > +2.6 Locking > > > > -The memory controller uses the following hierarchy > > + lock_page_cgroup()/unlock_page_cgroup() should not be called under > > + mapping->tree_lock. > > > > Because I never understood very well, I will ask. Why lock_page_cgroup() > should not be called under mapping->tree_lock? > > Thanks > Vivek
| |