Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:36:45 +0200 | Subject | Re: execve() returns ENOENT when ld-linux.so isn't found | From | Olaf van der Spek <> |
| |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> writes: > >> File not found is a very common error message with a pretty will >> understood meaning. > > And perfectly applicable here (as you write yourself in the subject).
No, it's not. It does not apply to the argument of the function called.
>> Overloading another error code would avoid this confusion, especially >> since it's far less used. > > Changing a well understood error number into a totally misleading one > only increases confusion.
Why is it totally misleading? The proposed new one is actually very close.
Olaf
| |