lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject[57/89] hwmon: (w83781d) Request I/O ports individually for probing
    2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

    ------------------

    commit b0bcdd3cd0adb85a7686b396ba50493871b1135c upstream.

    Different motherboards have different PNP declarations for
    W83781D/W83782D chips. Some declare the whole range of I/O ports (8
    ports), some declare only the useful ports (2 ports at offset 5) and
    some declare fancy ranges, for example 4 ports at offset 4. To
    properly handle all cases, request all ports individually for probing.
    After we have determined that we really have a W83781D or W83782D
    chip, the useful port range will be requested again, as a single
    block.

    I did not see a board which needs this yet, but I know of one for lm78
    driver and I'd like to keep the logic of these two drivers in sync.

    Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
    Acked-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
    ---
    drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

    --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
    +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83781d.c
    @@ -1818,17 +1818,17 @@ static int __init
    w83781d_isa_found(unsigned short address)
    {
    int val, save, found = 0;
    + int port;

    - /* We have to request the region in two parts because some
    - boards declare base+4 to base+7 as a PNP device */
    - if (!request_region(address, 4, "w83781d")) {
    - pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request low part of region\n");
    - return 0;
    - }
    - if (!request_region(address + 4, 4, "w83781d")) {
    - pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request high part of region\n");
    - release_region(address, 4);
    - return 0;
    + /* Some boards declare base+0 to base+7 as a PNP device, some base+4
    + * to base+7 and some base+5 to base+6. So we better request each port
    + * individually for the probing phase. */
    + for (port = address; port < address + W83781D_EXTENT; port++) {
    + if (!request_region(port, 1, "w83781d")) {
    + pr_debug("w83781d: Failed to request port 0x%x\n",
    + port);
    + goto release;
    + }
    }

    #define REALLY_SLOW_IO
    @@ -1902,8 +1902,8 @@ w83781d_isa_found(unsigned short address
    val == 0x30 ? "W83782D" : "W83781D", (int)address);

    release:
    - release_region(address + 4, 4);
    - release_region(address, 4);
    + for (port--; port >= address; port--)
    + release_region(port, 1);
    return found;
    }




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-03-31 01:17    [W:4.494 / U:0.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site