Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:26:17 -0400 | From | Don Zickus <> | Subject | Re: [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup |
| |
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:46:50PM -0400, Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote: > Hi Don, > > +/* deprecated */ > > +static int __init nosoftlockup_setup(char *str) > > +{ > > + no_watchdog = 1; > > + return 1; > > +} > > +__setup("nosoftlockup", nosoftlockup_setup); > > +static int __init nonmi_watchdog_setup(char *str) > > +{ > > + no_watchdog = 1; > > + return 1; > > +} > > +__setup("nonmi_watchdog", nonmi_watchdog_setup); > didn't you just add nonmi_watchdog parameter? I don't think there's a reason > to keep compatibility here.
Hmm, I think you are right. I thought I added that because it existed in the old nmi_watchdog setup but I can't find it. So yeah, I can drop that.
Thanks, Don
| |