Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:46:50 -0400 | From | Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho <> | Subject | Re: [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup |
| |
Hi Don, > +/* deprecated */ > +static int __init nosoftlockup_setup(char *str) > +{ > + no_watchdog = 1; > + return 1; > +} > +__setup("nosoftlockup", nosoftlockup_setup); > +static int __init nonmi_watchdog_setup(char *str) > +{ > + no_watchdog = 1; > + return 1; > +} > +__setup("nonmi_watchdog", nonmi_watchdog_setup); didn't you just add nonmi_watchdog parameter? I don't think there's a reason to keep compatibility here.
the rest of the patch looks fine to me
-- Aristeu
| |