[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: execve() returns ENOENT when isn't found
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Ulrich Drepper <> wrote:
> No.  ENOENT is the right value.
> Once again, read my first message.  The shell cannot just report the
> error anyway since there can be many different reasons for the
> problem.  If the dynamic linker is missing it has to be discovered and
> then reported.  In that message the correct error code is ENOENT.
> Don't try to change things which are as good as any other solution.
> The error message alone is in no case sufficient.  Fix your shells.

What about other apps that call execve?
Sounds like a lot of code duplication is needed.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-26 19:43    [W:0.059 / U:4.292 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site