Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:56:31 +0800 | From | Miao Xie <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily |
| |
on 2010-3-25 18:23, Miao Xie wrote: > on 2010-3-11 19:03, Nick Piggin wrote: >> Well... I do think seqlocks would be a bit simpler because they don't >> require this checking and synchronizing of this patch. > > Hi, Nick Piggin > > I have made a new patch which uses seqlock to protect mems_allowed and mempolicy. > please review it. > > title: [PATCH -mmotm] cpuset,mm: use seqlock to protect task->mempolicy and mems_allowed >
Sorry! Please ignore this patch, because I sent an old version. I'll send the new one later.
Regards! Miao
| |