Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:50:04 +1100 | From | Neil Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c |
| |
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:20:11 +0000 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:12:23PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Two patches. > > > > The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially > > confusing. > > > > The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch. It > > seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other > > code that walks the super_blocks list. > > See #untested in vfs tree... >
Ahhh, I see I've been beaten to it by 2 days... I should have posted that patch months ago :-)
Thanks anyway.
NeilBrown
| |