lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c
From
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 22:54, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 21:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my killfile
>> > with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch from you.
>>
>> Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i
>> checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)
>
> I disagree with that being a relevant argument in the technical
> discussion on the relative merits of two implementations of a given
> facility. I also disagree with your numbers, if you talk about
> deployement, I would be very very surprised if ARM wasn't close to
> on-par with x86.

FWIW, several years ago a MontaVista representative said there were more Linux
units that did have their RT extensions than there were Linux units
that did not have them...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-23 09:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans