[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance
Yes, it is included into my list.
When I will submit it into stable, I will include it also.


On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:55 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug,
>> so -stable would be nice.
> Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was
> included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix
> breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system").
> Linus

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-24 01:05    [W:0.065 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site