lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Writable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1)
Hi!

> > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests
> > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and
> > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request.
> > >
> > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been
> > > over-looked, please point that out to me
> >
> > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219
> >
> > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to
> > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge
> > window.
>
> Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any
> serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ...
>
> Any word on this?

Maybe noone cars? Try to push it through akpm?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-03-23 15:01    [W:0.043 / U:23.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site