Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:59:25 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Writable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1) |
| |
Hi!
> > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests > > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and > > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request. > > > > > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been > > > over-looked, please point that out to me > > > > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219 > > > > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to > > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge > > window. > > Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any > serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ... > > Any word on this?
Maybe noone cars? Try to push it through akpm? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |